From: Grant Callaghan (email@example.com)
Date: Fri 25 Oct 2002 - 19:25:05 GMT
>Dawkins begins his definition of "meme" in "The Extended Phenotype"
>with, "A unit of cultural inheritance". In recent discussions I have
>assumed that that was a necessary part of any definition of "meme".
>(That seems not to be the case for everyone, however. ;-))
>I propose that "A unit of cultural inheritance" is also sufficient to
>define a meme, and thus, is an acceptable standard definition.
>We may argue about exactly what and what kind of thing such a unit is,
>but I think that it is a good idea to separate the ontology debate from
>the question of definition. We may agree upon a definition of "unicorn"
>without agreeing about the ontology of unicorns.
>BTW, Dawkins defines "gene" simply as "a unit of heredity". Short,
>sweet, and sufficient. :-) No need to go into DNA, information, mutation
>rate, or anything else. KISS (Keep it simple, sister).
That sounds a bit like talking about computer programs without mentioning
their relationship to the computer. If we're not going to talk about what
memes do and how they do it, what's left to talk about? Culture is composed
of memes, but I supose it's enough to say that people create them and
contribute them to the culture. What else do we need to know? In fact, why
bother to talk about them at all?
Broadband? Dial-up? Get reliable MSN Internet Access.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri 25 Oct 2002 - 19:29:31 GMT