From: Wade T.Smith (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu 17 Oct 2002 - 05:17:30 GMT
On Thursday, October 17, 2002, at 01:11 , email@example.com wrote:
> That there is such a thing as a second tree ( for under your rubric,
> every tree has to have its own, nonrelational name).
I don't see that I'm saying that, at all.
I demand not only a second tree, and then a third one, but, never a
first one twice.
When did they enter into it?
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu 17 Oct 2002 - 05:22:16 GMT