Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id LAA19017 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Mon, 20 May 2002 11:52:16 +0100 Message-ID: <570E2BEE7BC5A34684EE5914FCFC368C10FCDB@fillan.stir.ac.uk> From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@STIR.AC.UK> To: "'email@example.com'" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: RE: New Scientist this week Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 11:45:37 +0100 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Filter-Info: UoS MailScan 0.1 [D 1] X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
<I don't buy the altruistic tack in Evo Psych. I can accept the
> males will do very silly and or dangerous things to mate, that1s no
> Where I have trouble with this argument is that people can knowingly plan
> their own deaths. You don't produce many kids if your dead. Secondly, the
> argument only concerns itself with males, despite the increasing incidence
> of female suicide bombers. Unless of course you stretch the argument to
> suggest they are reacting in some way to a threat to their future
> :-) It's hard science when the theory fits the facts.>
There's another way of thinking about altruistic sacrifice- social
status for offspring and relatives. A martyr (or a celibate monk, say), may
die, but family members may gain in social status as a result and
subsequently will do better in terms of survival and mate choice etc. Such
an argument works better in social insects where they share more genes with
each other, but when you add in cultural capital, if you like, that might be
a strong factor in humans also. This could work as well for women as for
men. The sisters of a female suicide bomber might have their mate chances
improved by association.
Apparently some 150,000 people applied to be on the 3rd series of
Big Brother in the UK (due to start at the end of this week)- why? The
presumed route to fame, celebrity etc. etc.
Recommended current reads (yes I managed to actually read- all the
way through- some books I bought recently), the Douglas Adams' collection
'The Salmon of Doubt' (It's Douglas Adams, nuff said), and Michael Moore's
'Stupid White Men' (if you're after some liberal American polemic- yes,
there is still some out there, despite the likes of John Malkovich
threatening to have some British journalists killed for condemning US
foreign policy in a student union debate).
-- The University of Stirling is a university established in Scotland by charter at Stirling, FK9 4LA. Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not disclose, copy or deliver this message to anyone and any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of the University of Stirling shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
=============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 20 2002 - 12:04:12 BST