Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id LAA07375 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Tue, 14 May 2002 11:24:46 +0100 Message-ID: <570E2BEE7BC5A34684EE5914FCFC368C10FCBF@fillan.stir.ac.uk> From: Vincent Campbell <email@example.com> To: "'firstname.lastname@example.org'" <email@example.com> Subject: RE: TV- entertainment promotes non-democratic feelings Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 11:03:53 +0100 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Filter-Info: UoS MailScan 0.1 [D 1] X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
Thanks for this.
<The connection between watching entertainmentprograms and the
> of uncertainty- feelings, is mush clearer than previously supposed.
> This is the conclusion of an investigation done by VUB- docent M. Hooghe.
> Suprisingly is that not so mush the newsprograms are the cause for those
> uncertainty feelings.
> " We could conclude that watching easy entertainment programs for a long
> time, points to a tendency to seclude oneself from the ( hostile and
> rous) outside world, and thus to search for an easy form of relaxation/
> sion/ relief."
> The outside world is perceived ( more and more) as a strange and
> environment, which must be avoided. According to Hooghe has the tendency
> to put everything under a jolly/ pleasant/ funny/ amusing spell important
> political and cultural consequenties.>
I think one of the interesting things here is not so much the
possible effects of the media, but the normative aspect of what the media
should and shouldn't do. There's a well known theory, called cultivation
theory, and this argues that because the media focus on events in
persistently distorted ways, audiences' priorities and concerns are
disproportionate to what they should be (e.g. the incidence of crime in the
media is far higher than in real life so people become more scared about
crime than they need to be). This piece looks like it offers a similar
idea. What it adds is the notion that if the media are used as an escape
from the real world that this is inherently wrong. Yet one of the problems
of the global media landscape (those of us in the developed world have
access to) is that we are routinely exposed to events that can emotionally
effect us, but which we (as in most ordinary people) can do little or
nothing about, sep 11th being an obvious example. (maybe there's the hook
for Paul Marsden's suicide contagion stuff- factually based media output is
routinely depressing and a reminder of the ordinary person's lack of power).
Also, the reality of fiction (if that's not an oxymoron :-)) is that
it is both an escape from the real world and a commentary on it, and why
should the mass media be any different to literature say? The presumption
here is that it's much worse in mass media because of its consequences, but
even if that were true (and I'd argue strongly it isn't) why shouldn't there
be political/cultural consequences? What if some of those consequences are
good (that's the old press freedom argument BTW, which people at one time
<What for me raises the question, to what programs were the Dutch
> for the last ten years that a guy like Fortuyn could get so mush support
> And by the way, Vincent, to some people, the media is one of the causes
> he was mudered. The media made of Fortuyn someone he really wasn 't....>
Well, I've no idea what Dutch TV is likle in terms of reporting
politics, but how fictional programming might lead to a right winger's
political success/assassination is beyond me. People's mindsets aren't
determined by the media, and the success of the far right, so marginalised
by mainstream newsmedia in Europe and America, is evidence of that. If
mainstream politicians want to know why people are turning away from them,
and I know this is a naive hope, they might consider actually reviewing
their policies and attitudes. Increasingly government in Western Europe and
North America (at the very least) is run by the corporate sector, for the
corporate sector and of the corporate sector, and yet they wonder why the
public are disillusioned with politics.
Er... rambling again, so I'll stop.
-- The University of Stirling is a university established in Scotland by charter at Stirling, FK9 4LA. Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not disclose, copy or deliver this message to anyone and any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of the University of Stirling shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
=============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 14 2002 - 11:36:38 BST