Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id UAA02893 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Sat, 11 May 2002 20:49:32 +0100 Message-ID: <000901c1f925$9af777a0$64b9eb3e@default> From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be> To: <email@example.com> References: <3E28E42A-650D-11D6-8F80-003065B9A95A@harvard.edu> Subject: Re: Fw: Future languages Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 21:53:23 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
----- Original Message -----
From: Wade T.Smith <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> On Saturday, May 11, 2002, at 02:06 , Kenneth Van Oost wrote:
> >> people developed a special, for everybody to understand,
> >> language.
> > Sorry Wade, but this is drawn out of context, but yes of course this is
> > what languages are for.
> I didn't say that's what language is _for_, I said that's what language
> The development of a pattern that is for everybody to understand.
<< Can 't agree more !
=============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat May 11 2002 - 21:08:13 BST