Re: Fw: Future languages

From: Wade T.Smith (
Date: Sat May 11 2002 - 19:31:00 BST

  • Next message: Kenneth Van Oost: "Re: future language"

    Received: by id TAA02760 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Sat, 11 May 2002 19:37:07 +0100
    Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 14:31:00 -0400
    Subject: Re: Fw: Future languages
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
    From: "Wade T.Smith" <>
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    In-Reply-To: <000901c1f916$c3c5c740$01a3eb3e@default>
    Message-Id: <>
    X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.481)
    Precedence: bulk

    On Saturday, May 11, 2002, at 02:06 , Kenneth Van Oost wrote:

    >> people developed a special, for everybody to understand,
    >> language.

    > Sorry Wade, but this is drawn out of context, but yes of course this is
    > what languages are for.

    I didn't say that's what language is _for_, I said that's what language

    The development of a pattern that is for everybody to understand.

    - Wade

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat May 11 2002 - 19:48:54 BST