Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id FAA01693 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Sat, 11 May 2002 05:34:46 +0100 X-Originating-IP: [18.104.22.168] From: "Grant Callaghan" <email@example.com> To: <firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: Re: Scientology cult pays $8,674,643 to ex-member to end 22-year legal battle. Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 21:28:19 -0700 X-Mailer: MSN Explorer 7.00.0021.1900 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_001_0001_01C1F869.9ACD87E0" Message-ID: <LAW2-OE34n4hO1epN3C000055b2@hotmail.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 May 2002 04:28:22.0769 (UTC) FILETIME=[49178E10:01C1F8A4] Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
----- Original Message -----
From: Wade T.Smith
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 3:05 PM
Subject: Re: Scientology cult pays $8,674,643 to ex-member to end 22-year legal battle.
On Friday, May 10, 2002, at 04:03 , Grant Callaghan wrote:
> Don't these guys proofread what they write before they publish?
I'm at a loss to find egregious errors in grammar in that article.
Perhaps some formatting messed up in the transfer, since the reply you
made allowed the entire article to be kept (tsk, tsk) had some strange
characters in it, perhaps they were from my emailer, perhaps from yours,
but, what, pray tell, is your objection to this?
I think what I saw had something to do with the reader I was using. Reading it on another reader the story was longer and the errors had disappeared.
GrantGet more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer...msn.com
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat May 11 2002 - 05:46:30 BST