RE: Bush's War on Terrorism

From: Grant Callaghan (
Date: Thu May 02 2002 - 16:10:30 BST

  • Next message: Bill Spight: "Re: future language"

    Received: by id QAA22641 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Thu, 2 May 2002 16:16:22 +0100
    X-Originating-IP: []
    From: "Grant Callaghan" <>
    Subject: RE: Bush's War on Terrorism
    Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 08:10:30 -0700
    Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
    Message-ID: <>
    X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 May 2002 15:10:31.0071 (UTC) FILETIME=[800822F0:01C1F1EB]
    Precedence: bulk

    You can't tell the players without a program. Here is a review that offers
    a couple of books to clear up the confusion on things Islamic.

    What Went Wrong?

    By Ahmed Rashid

    Issue cover-dated May 09, 2002

    Unholy War: Terror in the Name of Islam," by John Esposito. Oxford
    University Press. $25

    "What Went Wrong? Western Impact and Middle Eastern Response," by Bernard
    Lewis. Oxford University Press. $23

    NOT SURPRISINGLY, books on Islam and Central Asia have proliferated since
    the September 11 attacks on the United States. For the discerning reader,
    picking through the huge choice now available is not easy. But two new short
    books stand out--not least because they have been written by two of
    America's best-known specialists on Islam.

    John Esposito, one of the leading American academic experts on contemporary
    Islam and the Middle East and a long-time advocate of greater understanding
    between Islam and the West, has written a profound book that gives the most
    comprehensive and rounded view of the origins of "Islamic rage."

    Esposito's book is largely written for a Western general audience, but it
    has enough insight to be immensely valuable to experts. His most important
    contribution is placing Osama bin Laden in a much wider context than a mere
    expression of terrorism, jihad or Islamic rage. He explains the developments
    that have influenced the growth of terrorism, such as the Afghan war against
    the Soviet Union, the policies pursued by Saudi Arabia, the growth of global
    jihad ideology, U.S. policies, and the conflicts in the Middle East.

    He also delves deeply into the meaning of jihad as it has evolved over the
    centuries and how it is interpreted across the Islamic world today, giving
    readers the most comprehensive survey of jihad ideology and practice in
    print today.

    Similarly, Esposito gives us a short history of Islamic fundamentalism,
    drawing thumbnail sketches of its most important ideologues from the
    13th-century Ibn Taymiyya to the 18th-century jihadi movement in Saudi
    Arabia, to the three most prominent proponents of jihad in the 20th
    century--Hasan al Banna, the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt,
    Maulana Mawdudi, the founder of the Jamiat-e-Islami in India and Pakistan,
    and Sayyid Qutub, who first theorized about a vanguard group of committed

    Esposito shows how bin Laden incorporated the teachings of all these figures
    in his creation of the Al Qaeda terror movement while using recent events in
    Egypt, Afghanistan, Algeria and Palestine to turn theory into practice.

    He also draws a useful comparison between the ideological extremists and
    modern Muslim reformers--in particular Anwar Ibrahim, the former deputy
    premier of Malaysia, Mohammed Khatami, president of Iran, and Abdurrahman
    Wahid, the former president of Indonesia--showing how their message of
    trying to create a dialogue between civilizations has been ignored by the
    extremists and the West.

    Esposito does not spare his fellow-Americans for their ignorance about the
    Islamic world and their lack of exposure to world events and ideas. "Our
    knowledge of Islam, of the vast majority of Muslims and its connections to
    the Judeo-Christian tradition remains minimal or non-existent," he writes.

    Esposito's final warning is to the Muslim regimes who may try to use the war
    on terrorism to perpetuate dictatorial rule. "The failure to address the
    relationship between faith to national identity and to institution-building
    contributes to instability and risks massive social explosions. Governments
    that rely on social control rather than consultation, that employ violence
    and repression, create a climate that contributes to radicalization and
    violence against the state."

    His message is clear: The West has to avoid strengthening repressive Muslim
    regimes around the world.

    While Esposito takes us through the world of contemporary Islam, Princeton
    professor Bernard Lewis's book takes us on a historical survey, asking the
    very questions that Muslims spend a lot of time debating: What were the
    causes of the decline of Islamic civilisation and the rise of the West in
    recent centuries?

    Lewis, who is the foremost American historian on the Muslim world--and whose
    short, prescient essay is on The New York Times bestseller list--starts by
    explaining how Islam was for centuries the leading civilisation in the

    The tension between religious concerns and political needs has always been a
    major contradiction for Islamic rulers and society because Islam has no
    formal church, and piety and Islamic law, or sharia, have always clashed
    with the needs of government.

    In Islam, church and state have always been considered one. But, in practice
    it never has been so except for a brief period in Arabia when the Prophet
    Muhammad was both the religious and political leader.

    That is the reason why so many of today's Islamic extremists are determined
    to try and recreate that imagined community of believers.

    Lewis spends much time explaining the demise of the Ottoman Empire and how
    difficult it was for its rulers to gain religious permission to allow
    foreigners to train and modernize the court, the military and the
    bureaucracy. Even the development of printing and newspapers was delayed
    until the ulema, or Islamic scholars, approved.

    Lewis makes the critical point that the status of women in Islamic society
    and the West "was the most profound single difference" between them. Lewis
    demonstrates how Islamic societies have modernized without becoming totally
    Westernized. The emancipation of women should have been seen as an attempt
    to modernize rather than Westernize. It's an important distinction in
    today's Muslim world and something which many rulers have failed to realize.

    There are two shortcomings in an otherwise brilliant overview. Lewis fails
    to mention the influence of Marxism in Islamic societies in the 20th century
    and how, for a time, Marxism gripped the imagination of many Muslims as an
    appropriate anti-colonial ideology. And he does not mention how, in the
    contemporary period, the Islamic world's perceptions have dramatically
    altered due to America's unequivocal support for Israel. Readers should read
    both books together in order to understand today's crisis in the Muslim

    Ahmed Rashid is a senior writer with the REVIEW and the author of Jihad: The
    Rise of Militant Islam in Central Asia

    Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 02 2002 - 16:29:31 BST