Re: Saving the ethnosphere

From: Philip Jonkers (
Date: Wed May 01 2002 - 06:00:40 BST

  • Next message: Philip Jonkers: "Re: teleology and language"

    Received: by id GAA19113 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Wed, 1 May 2002 06:13:19 +0100
    Message-ID: <009201c1f0cd$24e47b40$5e2ffea9@oemcomputer>
    From: "Philip Jonkers" <>
    To: <>
    References: <>
    Subject: Re: Saving the ethnosphere
    Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 22:00:40 -0700
    Organization: Prodigy Internet
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
    X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
    Precedence: bulk

    > IMO, this is a major memetic extinction, right there. I really want to
    > see how you can explain calling widespread destruction of cultures and
    > associated memetic contents, as "evolution".

    Allow me. Evolution knows three elements: variation, retention and
    The latter implies a redundancy of that what has to be selected. That is,
    there are too many entities running for selection. This is where extinction
    in, a fate beset on those entities who don't make it to be selected.


    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 01 2002 - 06:25:08 BST