Re: future language

From: Wade Smith (
Date: Tue Apr 30 2002 - 14:11:08 BST

  • Next message: Grant Callaghan: "Re: future language"

    Received: by id OAA17084 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 14:17:24 +0100
    Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 09:11:08 -0400
    Subject: Re: future language
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
    From: Wade Smith <>
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    In-Reply-To: <>
    Message-Id: <>
    X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.481)
    Precedence: bulk

    On Tuesday, April 30, 2002, at 08:38 , Vincent Campbell wrote:

    > So they have unique
    > languages, customs, beliefs blah, blah, blah, what utility is
    > gained across
    > that societal gap?

    The unique thing about science, and facts, is that it is backed
    up by the entire universe. Cultural myths and beliefs are not,
    and therefore, as we become more a part of the universe and not
    just our conceptions of it, these beliefs will fall like chaff,
    suitable for volumes of fairy tale collections, which is, IMHO,
    where they should always have been, not that I don't like fairy
    tales, they just shouldn't be applied to a universe they are not
    explaining to any real extent.

    But the romance of cultural universes is real, as I love fairy
    tales. The romance is what I would miss, if it were to go, and,
    perhaps, that is what people are seeing as fading from the

    And yes, re: Santayana, the Taliban need their place in the
    fairy gallery just as much as leprechauns and silkies do.

    - Wade

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 30 2002 - 14:29:04 BST