Fwd: Skin tones and racial stereotyping

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Tue Apr 30 2002 - 13:49:00 BST

  • Next message: Wade Smith: "Re: future language"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA17041 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 30 Apr 2002 13:55:14 +0100
    Subject: Fwd: Skin tones and racial stereotyping
    Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 08:49:00 -0400
    x-sender: wsmith1@camail.harvard.edu
    x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
    From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
    To: "memetics list" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
    Message-Id: <20020430124923.0C6061FD46@camail.harvard.edu>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    Skin tones and racial stereotyping

    By Gareth Cook, Globe Staff, 4/30/2002


    Some things are hard to talk about, and some things you just don't talk
    about at all.

    Race in America is hard to talk about. The nation was built in part with
    the blood of African slaves and, centuries later, Americans are still so
    divided that they can't seem to discuss race without feeling
    uncomfortable, frustrated or angry.

    Then there is what Keith Maddox, an assistant psychology professor at
    Tufts University, has chosen to talk about - stereotypes of light- and
    dark-skinned blacks, including stereotypes in the African-American
    community itself. Despite the evidence - from history, from striking
    studies of inequality, from individual stories - that skin tone is a
    factor in how blacks are perceived and treated, it is an area avoided in
    polite conversation, Maddox said, and an area where most scientists have
    feared to tread.

    ''It is something that in the past has been thought of as divisive and
    explosive and something we shouldn't ever talk about in public,'' Maddox
    said. ''But, if you don't try to understand it, then things will never
    get better.''

    Recently, Maddox, an African-American himself, published the results of a
    set of experiments that showed for the first time that both blacks and
    whites unconsciously categorize blacks by their skin tone, and that both
    blacks and whites are well aware of the stereotype that paints
    dark-skinned blacks as inferior. His work is unusual, other researchers
    said, not just for his bravery, but because he is using a basic
    experimental approach, in some ways quite ingenious, that hasn't been
    brought to this question before.

    ''This is a good thing he is doing,'' said Kendrick Brown, an assistant
    professor of psychology at Macalester College in St. Paul, Minn., who
    studies how a person's skin tone affects their own psychology. ''With
    experiments, you can get a much better handle on cause and effect.''

    During the slave trade, light-skinned blacks were sometimes treated
    better by slave owners, becoming ''house slaves'' with more
    responsibility and privileges if they could pass the ''Brown Paper Bag
    Test'' - that is, skin lighter then a brown paper bag. Well after
    abolition, light-skinned blacks formed exclusive social clubs, Brown
    said, keeping the distinction alive.

    In modern times, research has uncovered compelling evidence that
    inequality moves on a sliding color scale among blacks in America. In
    1991, two scientists analyzed data from the National Survey of Black
    Americans, an extensive survey conducted a decade before, that revealed
    how blacks of different skin tones fared in society. The findings,
    reported in the American Journal of Sociology, were disturbing:
    Darker-skinned blacks fell lower, on average, than fairer-skinned blacks
    in measures of income and education.

    ''These facts suggest,'' the authors wrote, ''that the effects of skin
    tone are not only historical curiosities from a legacy of slavery and
    racism, but present-day mechanisms that influence who gets what in

    Maddox wants to understand precisely how the stereotypes behind this
    inequality function - in whites as well as blacks. It is difficult
    research to do, though, because it is hard to get honest answers from
    people about how they feel, and because people are often not even aware
    of subtle prejudices that shape their view of the world.

    So Maddox recruited college students from the Boston area, but didn't
    tell them precisely what he was looking for. He showed them recorded
    pieces of conversation while they looked at pictures of black men, some
    light-skinned and some dark-skinned. The students were later asked to
    match statements with the face of the person who made them.

    What he was interested in is the identification mistakes they made -
    particularly the kinds of mistakes they made. There is a substantial body
    of psychological research that shows people are more likely to mistake
    one thing for another if they belong to a mental category the person uses.

    In this study, Maddox found that the students were more likely to mistake
    the comments of a light-skinned black man for those of another
    light-skinned black man. Maddox also proved the students were not
    unconsciously noticing some other common facial feature. In some cases,
    for example, he digitally altered the picture of a dark-skinned man to
    make him appear light-skinned. When this was done, students categorized
    him by his new skin tone.

    Both white students and black students showed the same tendency to
    unconsciously categorize people by their skin tone, according to the
    study, which was published in the February Personality and Social
    Psychology Bulletin. In the same paper, coauthored by Stephanie Gray of
    Tufts, Maddox also described the results of another test that showed that
    blacks and whites are aware of harsh stereotypes about darker-skinned
    blacks as more likely to be criminal, poor, or unmotivated.

    The next step in the research is to try to show how people's attitudes
    are shaped, and how they manifest themselves. The goal, Maddox said, is
    to develop a clear picture of how racial stereotypes operate. That way,
    he said, we should all feel more comfortable talking about them - and, by
    talking about them, eventually getting beyond them.

    Gareth Cook can be reached at cook@globe.com.

    This story ran on page C1 of the Boston Globe on 4/30/2002. Copyright
    2002 Globe Newspaper Company.

    ===============================This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 30 2002 - 14:15:22 BST