Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id RAA23837 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Thu, 18 Apr 2002 17:44:19 +0100 Message-ID: <003f01c1e6f6$8720c6a0$5e2ffea9@oemcomputer> From: "Philip Jonkers" <email@example.com> To: <firstname.lastname@example.org> References: <923D41E0-5285-11D6-9556-003065B9A95A@harvard.edu> Subject: Re: Thoughts and Perceptions Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 09:31:40 -0700 Organization: Prodigy Internet Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Science is not a system of memes, but a system of removing the
> subjectivity of the human observer from the measurement. It is objective
> as objective can get with human agents as part of the mix.
If science is not a system of memes then Wade how would you call
scientific elements like:
E = mc^2 or F = ma or 'DNA is composed out of nucleotides' ?
If these things were not memetic how could they possibly disseminate
across the scientific community? Some, such as E = mc^2, even make it to
become known over virtually the entire human population. If that didn't
happen through memetic transmission then what else mechanism was
> Science finds nothing objective about astrology.
If effective in some sense it may be that astrology exploits our viability
self-fulfilling prophecies. Humans have a tendency to cling to non-sensical
systems that give them a sense of security, albeit of a false kind of
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Apr 18 2002 - 18:18:52 BST