Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id PAA23510 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Thu, 18 Apr 2002 15:29:52 +0100 Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 10:23:52 -0400 Subject: Re: Thoughts and Perceptions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: "Wade T.Smith" <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <3CBECD4F.645C8555@pacbell.net> Message-Id: <E83E7E0C-52D7-11D6-A1A2-003065B9A95A@harvard.edu> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.481) Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
On Thursday, April 18, 2002, at 09:42 , Bill Spight wrote:
> Of course you can. It's just false. :-)
Yup, which is why I said concepts about gravity are memes if and only if
they are false.
> The fact, ahem, is, "Some concepts are backed up by the entire
Yes, if they are true concepts, duh.... But, why (oh why?) substitute
'concept' for 'fact' in the first place? Once a concept is shown to be
factual, it is a fact, ain't it? Time to make it one.
This useless and insipid term substitution, when one and the correct one
will do, is a great source of annoyance to me.
If the proper word exists, use it.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Apr 18 2002 - 16:08:19 BST