Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id VAA21025 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Wed, 17 Apr 2002 21:22:48 +0100 From: "Lawrence DeBivort" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: <email@example.com> Subject: RE: Subliminal advertising Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 16:17:29 -0400 Message-ID: <NEBBKOADILIOKGDJLPMAAEJECOAA.firstname.lastname@example.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 In-Reply-To: <73AEFC3A-523A-11D6-9556-003065B9A95A@harvard.edu> Importance: Normal Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> > Does subliminal advertising work? Sure!
> No, it doesn't work, in any real sense of the word. So, don't go saying
> > Advertisers have learned to push your buttons.
> Yes, they have. Blatantly, not 'subliminally'. As you say, there ain't
> nothin' subliminal about a bit of tit.
Wade, I keep going back to research methodology: How would we know? How do
you know it doesn't work?
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 17 2002 - 22:33:14 BST