Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id PAA20195 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Wed, 17 Apr 2002 15:51:44 +0100 Message-ID: <570E2BEE7BC5A34684EE5914FCFC368C10FC44@fillan.stir.ac.uk> From: Vincent Campbell <email@example.com> To: "'firstname.lastname@example.org'" <email@example.com> Subject: RE: memetics-digest V1 #1020 Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 15:44:50 +0100 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Filter-Info: UoS MailScan 0.1 [D 1] X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
<Vincent- I hope to hear you say that, (perhaps because someone in
> position of authority and not in any position of expertise made you),
> you've done some research or analysis of so-called 'subliminal' effects,
> and found those claims bogus.
> Not that there is not a very interesting set of studies about 'under'
> perceptions, but, to my knowledge, all claims of 'subliminal'
> advertising or learning are shams?>
Unfortunately not, although there is a fantastic dismantling of the
claims about subliminal advertising which I think I've mentioned before on
the list in 'The Skeptical Inquirer' which is available online, from a guy
who gave evidence in the Judas Priest trial. They indeed show how ideas
about subliminal advertising are rubbish and cite a lot of evidence to
support their analysis.
For those on the list with Richard Brodie's book, compare the above
article with his section on subliminal advertising. Subliminal advertising
is a red herring for memetics, IMHO.
People don't even take in much of what is super-liminal in media
content, let alone anything else (see for example Barrie Gunter's 1987 book
'Poor Reception' which reviews the mountain of data showing poor recall of
broadcast news the world over).
-- The University of Stirling is a university established in Scotland by charter at Stirling, FK9 4LA. Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not disclose, copy or deliver this message to anyone and any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of the University of Stirling shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
=============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 17 2002 - 16:05:50 BST