Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id AAA12170 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Sun, 14 Apr 2002 00:55:12 +0100 Message-Id: <firstname.lastname@example.org> X-Sender: email@example.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 19:45:42 -0400 To: firstname.lastname@example.org From: Ray Recchia <email@example.com> Subject: Re: media violence report in Science In-Reply-To: <94D47436-4F31-11D6-8A33-003065B9A95A@harvard.edu> References: <NEBBKOADILIOKGDJLPMAGEEECOAA.firstname.lastname@example.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
I don't know. I have a lot of respect for 'Science'. It is one of the most
respected scientific journals in the world. I don't think they publish
'bogus' research. And it makes perfect sense to me. See violence. Do
violence. Memetic transmission at its most basic. Especially when the more
repellant results are censored.
At 06:55 PM 4/13/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>On Saturday, April 13, 2002, at 06:20 , Lawrence DeBivort wrote:
>>What do you make of the article Ray posted? It suggests that watching
>>violence on TV DOES lead to a greater propensity for violent behavior in the
>I think it's a bunch of poppycock and reactionary nonsense.
>I also think any and all of the 'research' is bogus.
>This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
>Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
>For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 14 2002 - 01:06:15 BST