Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA09566 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Fri, 12 Apr 2002 12:21:14 +0100 Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 07:15:09 -0400 Subject: Re: Re Grammar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: "Wade T.Smith" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <C4C20D0AEF0BF84B90CFEA0105EEB0BD0159C186@selene.shu.ac.uk> Message-Id: <8CB4FF62-4E06-11D6-9809-003065B9A95A@harvard.edu> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.481) Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
On Friday, April 12, 2002, at 04:26 , Price, Ilfryn wrote:
> the variety of vocalisation we can make, and other primate species
Interesting. I would have perhaps said just the opposite, that we are
not that different, nor others as limited, as we might think.
Has there really been a study of the disparity and the greater range of
vocalizations possible in homo sapiens, compared with, for example, some
of the gibbons?
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 12 2002 - 12:33:44 BST