Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id OAA05890 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Wed, 10 Apr 2002 14:10:15 +0100 Subject: Re: memetics-digest V1 #1011 Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 09:04:07 -0400 x-sender: firstname.lastname@example.org x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <email@example.com> To: "memetics list" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-Id: <20020410130405.28EB01FD5B@camail.harvard.edu> Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
On 04/09/02 22:20, Scott Chase said this-
>I thought the creative event would precipitate from within, where
>"unconcious" elements that have been fermenting combine and bubble to the
>surface in a somewhat syncretic manner
Yes. _If allowed to_ by the release of pre-conceptions.
>[Jung] creativity is
>nothing more than novel juxtaposition of old material pulled from elsewhere
Insipid little theory.
>that was quite a creative
>flash which came from within the noggin.
Man is the measure of all things. But, yes, the 'flash' does not happen
unless attention is _not_ on the matter at hand.
Creativity, and the creative act, are, IMHO, the most interesting facet
of the mind, and of the human. Also, perhaps, the most complex, and thus,
the least likely to be simply described, and I do not wish to make it any
simpler than it is.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 10 2002 - 14:37:46 BST