RE: To be or not to be: memetics a science?

From: Lawrence DeBivort (
Date: Tue Apr 02 2002 - 16:44:27 BST

  • Next message: Lawrence DeBivort: "RE: To be or not to be: memetics a science?"

    Received: by id RAA19865 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Tue, 2 Apr 2002 17:48:15 +0100
    From: "Lawrence DeBivort" <>
    To: <>
    Subject: RE: To be or not to be: memetics a science? 
    Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 10:44:27 -0500
    Message-ID: <>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
    Importance: Normal
    In-Reply-To: <000b01c1d91f$7a1b2f20$5603aace@oemcomputer>
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
    Precedence: bulk

    Good morning to all,

    My apologies for my silence: I am at work tracking the memetic erosion of
    the adminstration's post-Sept 11 policies, and tracking the
    Palestinian-Israeli situation. The latter leaves me quite sad, as the dance
    of death that both parties are locked into shows no sign of abating, and
    leaves little room for rational thinking about more peaceful alternatives.
    The fact that the memetic pickings are rich does not alleviate the sadness.


    > Philip Jonkers:
    > Boy are we quiet out there or what?

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 02 2002 - 18:04:11 BST