Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id OAA19190 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Tue, 2 Apr 2002 14:43:17 +0100 Subject: Re: To be or not to be: memetics a science? Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 08:36:46 -0500 x-sender: email@example.com x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: "memetics list" <email@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-Id: <20020402133704.E64D91FD5C@camail.harvard.edu> Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
On 03/31/02 20:48, Philip Jonkers said this-
>are the variables involved too complex to be isolated
>for experimental study
No..., however, the only way to effectively reduce the variables is
totally inhumane and unethical. (This is true in psychology as well.)
Computer modeling combined with selectively isolated neurological
activity analysis and fMRI-mapped responses may be the only ethical path,
and I think there is great promise there.
I don't think culture will escape the laboratory, at all. Nor should it.
Man is the measure of all things.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 02 2002 - 14:55:42 BST