Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id QAA20677 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Mon, 18 Mar 2002 16:22:33 GMT X-Originating-IP: [22.214.171.124] From: "Grant Callaghan" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com Subject: Re: FW: MD Dawkins on quantum/mysticism convergence Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 08:16:40 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: <LAW2-F131Z97xlp7Neu0000c1e4@hotmail.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Mar 2002 16:16:40.0628 (UTC) FILETIME=[497BB740:01C1CE98] Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
>Subject: Re: FW: MD Dawkins on quantum/mysticism convergence
>Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 21:32:12 +0000
>on 3/17/02 7:59 PM, memetics-digest at firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 11:21:36 -0500
> > From: "Wade T.Smith" <email@example.com>
> > Subject: Re: FW: MD Dawkins on quantum/mysticism convergence
> > On Sunday, March 17, 2002, at 10:38 , Grant Callaghan wrote:
> >> To attack such usages for a lack of narrowness is to misunderstand the
> >> why and how of what the author was doing with his words. For subjects
> >> like mysticism or religion, we have to resort to metaphor in an attempt
> >> to explain ideas that are too abstract to be understood through
> >> language.
>Agree with you Grant, but shouldn't the 'we' be they?
I definitely include myself in this group.
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 18 2002 - 16:33:09 GMT