Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id BAA15904 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Sun, 17 Mar 2002 01:30:03 GMT Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 20:24:10 -0500 Subject: Re: FW: MD Dawkins on quantum/mysticism convergence Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: "Wade T.Smith" <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <NEBBKOADILIOKGDJLPMAAEMICMAA.email@example.com> Message-Id: <AEC78E78-3945-11D6-9A4F-003065B9A95A@harvard.edu> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.481) Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
On Saturday, March 16, 2002, at 07:19 , Lawrence DeBivort wrote:
> Especially when one remembers that the meaning of the term quantum is
> smallest discernible amount. new Age folks sometimes think it means the
> opposite, as in 'a quantum leap.'
But, AFAIK, that refers to the energy state of electrons, and it _is_ a
vast leap across a gulf of immense energy, atomically speaking.
But, some physicist will be coming along shortly to beat my ears with
It also refers to a dreadful TV show, but, that's another matter.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 17 2002 - 01:40:40 GMT