Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA14543 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Sat, 16 Mar 2002 12:26:15 GMT From: "Jim" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: "Memetics@Mmu. Ac. Uk" <email@example.com> Subject: Re: Cultural traits and vulnerability to memes Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 07:19:58 -0500 Message-ID: <KJEBKLEEKBAIPINPHKHHOEMHCCAA.firstname.lastname@example.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Importance: Normal Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
An awful lot of the discussion lately seems to be looking at isolated,
extreme incidents (e.g., parents killing their children) and somehow trying
to essentially argue that "the memes did it." Even in mental illnesses
where there are clear genetic links (e.g., bi-polar disorder) you would not
argue that the genes did it if a person with bi-polar did something illegal
while in a manic state -- or even that the bi-polar disorder was genetically
"caused," for that matter. The most that could probably be argued is there
was a genetic disposition to bi-polar disorder. And it would still be
another leap from that to specific behavior.
I have two questions.
1) Is there a way we can move away from this mechanistic, fatalistic
discussion of memes towards something that is more nuanced?
2) Since isolated egregious incidents at best support conjecture, to what
extent has any of the conjecture on memes been operationalized and tested?
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 16 2002 - 12:36:41 GMT