Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id CAA11330 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Fri, 15 Mar 2002 02:11:55 GMT Subject: Re: Predicting the Stock Market Is Child's Play Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 21:06:02 -0500 x-sender: firstname.lastname@example.org x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <email@example.com> To: "Memetics Discussion List" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-Id: <20020315020600.075BD1FD49@camail.harvard.edu> Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
Hi AaronLynch@aol.com -
>But what am I saying? Perhaps I should just establish the Immaturity Growth
>Fund, a mutual fund whose stocks are all picked by a 5 year old. I could say
>"Outperformed FTSE 100 for 1 year, 5 years, and the life of the fund."
>want to invest? ;-)
If it were an established fund with that sort of record, yes....
The more interesting thing in the item I forwarded (I'm totally aware of
how we forget the misses and the impish shine upon this report), is that
the system that used the standard predictors simply followed the general
course of the market- and that is, it dwindled, this time.
The young girl's choices were described as 'random' but, I suspect that's
a liberty, especially when I see one of her choices is Cadbury
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 15 2002 - 02:22:33 GMT