Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA09473 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Thu, 14 Mar 2002 13:06:09 GMT Subject: Re: question about memes Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 08:00:15 -0500 x-sender: firstname.lastname@example.org x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <email@example.com> To: "Memetics Discussion List" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-Id: <20020314130013.18C9F1FD47@camail.harvard.edu> Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
Hi Joachim Maier -
>because she wanted to save them from Satan.
My argument has always been that even declarations of intentions are
irrelevant to the actual behavior.
Killing one's children predates satan, therefore the behavior (the meme)
predates satan. Satan is only the latest name of this.
>The consequence might be that memes are actually not so powerful as
>sometimes discussed here. The memes might just give form to what actually
>works on a more emotional level.
If all we talk about are the names of memes, that is true.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 14 2002 - 13:16:40 GMT