Re relationships among memetics, semiotics, and Kuhnian view of s cience?

From: Price, Ilfryn (
Date: Tue Mar 12 2002 - 09:50:19 GMT

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: Study suggests love conquered all"

    Received: by id JAA04880 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Tue, 12 Mar 2002 09:57:20 GMT
    Message-ID: <>
    From: "Price, Ilfryn" <>
    To: "Memetics List (E-mail)" <>
    Subject: Re relationships among memetics, semiotics, and Kuhnian view of s cience?
    Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 09:50:19 -0000
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
    Precedence: bulk


    Welcome Jim

    >There are relatively obvious potential relationships among memetics, semiotics, and Thomas Kuhn's description of how scientific theories
    are created and sustainedBefore putting a lot of energy into describing these relationships I was wondering if any of this has been a
    previous subject of discussion or if there are previous articles in the area. Like to avoid reinventing the wheel.>

    See David Hull Science as a Process (1988 Chicago University Press) or Price (1995) Organisational Mmemetics, Organisational Learning as a
    Selection Process (URL below)

    If Price
    Facilities Management Graduate Centre
    Sheffield Hallam University
    Unit 7 Science Park
    Sheffield S1 1WB
    T +44 (0)114 225 4032
    F +44 (0)114 225 4038
    M +44 (0)7976 422354
    http/www/ <>

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 12 2002 - 10:07:49 GMT