Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id OAA01294 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Sun, 10 Mar 2002 14:27:58 GMT Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 09:22:41 -0500 Subject: Re: is forgetting adaptive? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: "Wade T.Smith" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <F2455LqN33HFnwpGR88000051da@hotmail.com> Message-Id: <480AB16E-3432-11D6-93B1-003065B9A95A@harvard.edu> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.481) Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
On Sunday, March 10, 2002, at 07:51 , Scott Chase wrote:
> If something is no longer current or pressing, why remember it?
> Wouldn't it be better for this memory (or at least its particulars) to
> recede, allowing space for newer, more pertinent, information?
If time would only stand still, we would remember everything.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 10 2002 - 14:47:54 GMT