Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id DAA07570 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Thu, 28 Feb 2002 03:02:53 GMT X-Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Message-Id: <email@example.com> In-Reply-To: <20020227031649.66CAB1FD5A@terri.harvard.edu> References: <20020227031649.66CAB1FD5A@terri.harvard.edu> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 21:57:31 -0500 To: firstname.lastname@example.org From: "Francesca S. Alcorn" <email@example.com> Subject: Re: ality Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
>Hi Dace -
>>Any data storage system ought to have a minimal level of accuracy far
>>beyond that of human memory.
>But, who ever said that memory is a data storage system to bring it into
Mightn't it be more a record of lessons learned, rather than actual
sensory records? Then the learning would be modified, but the
experiences themselves would be degraded.
Each new experience would be a sort of software upgrade.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 28 2002 - 03:13:04 GMT