Re: ality

From: Dace (
Date: Wed Feb 27 2002 - 20:37:14 GMT

  • Next message: Douglas Brooker: "Re: Rumsfeld Says He May Drop New Office of Influence"

    Received: by id UAA06571 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 20:41:31 GMT
    Message-ID: <003e01c1bfce$8c18faa0$1387b2d1@teddace>
    From: "Dace" <>
    To: <>
    References: <>
    Subject: Re: ality
    Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 12:37:14 -0800
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
    Precedence: bulk

    > Hi Dace -
    > >Any data storage system ought to have a minimal level of accuracy far
    > >beyond that of human memory.
    > No argument.
    > But, who ever said that memory is a data storage system to bring it into
    > this comparison?
    > - Wade

    It's the standard view. I'm not sure who first came up with the idea
    (Turing? Von Neumann?) , but it's now deeply ingrained in the modern
    outlook. So much so that to question it has become taboo.


    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 27 2002 - 20:51:31 GMT