Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id FAA13506 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Wed, 20 Feb 2002 05:46:09 GMT Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 00:41:01 -0500 Subject: Re: ality Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: "Wade T.Smith" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <001b01c1b9ca$3be6d340$2d86b2d1@teddace> Message-Id: <6C1992DF-25C4-11D6-8A35-003065B9A95A@harvard.edu> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.481) Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
On Tuesday, February 19, 2002, at 11:51 , Dace wrote:
> the only theory we have is what sea slug *brains* are
> up to when the slugs themselves remember things.
But memory _is_ what the brain is up to when we remember things....
> such as the ability of
> memories to reappear in a different neural region following brain
> damage and
> the continual disconnecting and reconnecting of neurons that ought to be
> forming static storage receptacles.
While there is nothing static about the brain at all, what has been
shown is not the 'reappearing' of memories, but the unusual recall of
certain types of memories, AFAIK. The fact remains that memories are a
function of the brain as much as color reception and recognition is.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 20 2002 - 05:56:01 GMT