Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id CAA08430 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Tue, 19 Feb 2002 02:06:50 GMT Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 21:01:38 -0500 Subject: Re: Words and memes: criteria for acceptance of new belief or meme Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: "Wade T.Smith" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <firstname.lastname@example.org> Message-Id: <9C4903E2-24DC-11D6-A677-003065B9A95A@harvard.edu> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.480) Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
On Monday, February 18, 2002, at 08:26 , Francesca S. Alcorn wrote:
> But I am arguing for their "fitness" in terms of what they offer the
Ain't arguing that.
What fits, fits.
Truth ain't got nothin' to do with it.
Until one tries to fit in all places, at all times, which is what this
world is coming to.
IMHO, there are many things worth losing, and shamanistic power is one
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 19 2002 - 02:16:28 GMT