Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id VAA07763 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Mon, 18 Feb 2002 21:50:17 GMT Message-Id: <firstname.lastname@example.org> X-Sender: email@example.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 16:47:20 -0500 To: firstname.lastname@example.org From: Keith Henson <email@example.com> Subject: RE: Words and memes: criteria for acceptance of new belief or meme In-Reply-To: <firstname.lastname@example.org> References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
At 04:28 PM 18/02/02 -0500, frankie wrote:
>>It is a classic psychological experiment. A substantial fraction of the
>>population would say they something in conflict with their
>>perception. Most would admit they had given in to social pressure, but
>>(IIRC) some would insist that they had really seen the shorter line as longer.
>>This might be a way to sort out people who could be turned into cult members.
>Yes, but it *was* Stanley Millgram who did the experiments, there are
Ah, thank you. It does sound like something he would have done.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 18 2002 - 22:03:34 GMT