Re: Memes Meta-Memes and Politics 3 of 3 (1988, updates 2002)

From: Wade T.Smith (
Date: Mon Feb 18 2002 - 18:46:47 GMT

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Re: Words and memes: criteria for acceptance of new belief or meme"

    Received: by id SAA07042 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 18:51:58 GMT
    Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 13:46:47 -0500
    Subject: Re: Memes Meta-Memes and Politics 3 of 3 (1988, updates 2002)
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
    From: "Wade T.Smith" <>
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    In-Reply-To: <p04320408b896f22afce6@[]>
    Message-Id: <>
    X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.480)
    Precedence: bulk

    On Monday, February 18, 2002, at 01:19 , Francesca S. Alcorn wrote:

    > there has to be a word that recognizes processes that function
    > across/at all levels of complexity.

    It might be called sociobiology.

    Which, IMHO, answers almost all of memetics' questions, goes on to ask
    and answer a few more, and gets cold shouldered as a result.

    Which is a pity, because it doesn't disclaim memetics at all. It just
    puts it in a rather smaller place than it might want to be.

    - Wade

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 18 2002 - 19:01:50 GMT