Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id RAA06460 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Mon, 18 Feb 2002 17:14:52 GMT X-Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Message-Id: <email@example.com> In-Reply-To: <firstname.lastname@example.org> References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 12:09:56 -0500 To: email@example.com From: "Francesca S. Alcorn" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: RE: Words and memes: criteria for acceptance of new belief or meme Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
>There are papers by Zimbardo from Stanford (now president of the
>American Psychological Association) that are directly on this topic.
>It looks like the mechanism is more one of resistance to social
>pressure than learned. I am trying to remember the name associated
>with that test of resistance to social pressure where most of the
>group acts a shills and one person is given the choice of going
>against the group which insists the longer line on a slide is
>shorter or the other way around.
Millgram? It wasn't a long queue or a short queue, but numbers of
dots on paper IIRC, and administering electric shocks.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 18 2002 - 17:38:10 GMT