Re: Why memeoids?

From: Wade T.Smith (
Date: Mon Feb 18 2002 - 16:30:39 GMT

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Re: Words and memes: criteria for acceptance of new belief or meme"

    Received: by id QAA06200 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 16:35:51 GMT
    Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 11:30:39 -0500
    Subject: Re: Why memeoids?
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
    From: "Wade T.Smith" <>
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    In-Reply-To: <>
    Message-Id: <>
    X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.480)
    Precedence: bulk

    On Monday, February 18, 2002, at 12:34 , Joe Dees wrote:

    > This is why a term that conflates the two is unsatisfactory to me for
    > the purposes of memetic study, as I consider memes to be irretrieveable
    > semantic (meaning-laden).

    So, do you like 'mememurs'?

    I do. (Being as humble as possible.)

    It don't conflate anything. (Love that word, sounds like a fart.)

    It purrs, all things considered.

    - Wade

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 18 2002 - 16:47:10 GMT