Fw: religious viruses

From: Philip Jonkers (philipjonkers@prodigy.net)
Date: Mon Feb 18 2002 - 09:41:02 GMT

  • Next message: AaronLynch@aol.com: "Re: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id IAA04589 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 18 Feb 2002 08:50:05 GMT
    Message-ID: <00b201c1b860$65285dc0$5e2ffea9@oemcomputer>
    From: "Philip Jonkers" <philipjonkers@prodigy.net>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: Fw: religious viruses
    Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 00:41:02 -0900
    Organization: Prodigy Internet
    Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00AF_01C1B814.F0B476E0"
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Philip Jonkers
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 8:36 PM
    Subject: Re: religious viruses

      Richard Dawkins (father of the 'meme'; would Susan Blackmore be the mother?...) has referred to religion as a 'virus'. With absolutley no axe of faith to grind I think this is too derisory a term to use and could actually be inaccurate. Granted there have been many mistakes made and downright atrocities committed by psychopaths sheltering under their respective churches to say nothing of the amount of bs propagated by them but I would like to propose the following.

      To label religions unconditionally as virusses is perhaps a little over the edge. Virusses

      are parasitic which reproduce at the expense of their hosts. Given that ideological religious schemes have survived for so long might indicate that they offered somekind

      of benefit to the hosts. I'm thinking of social coherence, religion tightens and unifies the

      group. In this sense religion in fact is symbiotic. That were the old days however. Today,

      with increased communication, immigration and ethnic mixing religion is a obstacle to

      achieve or maintain social harmony and rest. That is the virtue and usefulness of religion

      has greatly reduced, perhaps to such extent that is has changed color to parasitic.

      If so this may vary from region to region, I don't know.


    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 18 2002 - 09:01:26 GMT