Re: ality

From: Dace (
Date: Mon Feb 18 2002 - 08:19:24 GMT

  • Next message: Philip Jonkers: "Re: religious viruses"

    Received: by id IAA04494 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 08:23:43 GMT
    Message-ID: <007501c1b854$fa8d1c40$6086b2d1@teddace>
    From: "Dace" <>
    To: <>
    References: <>
    Subject: Re: ality
    Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 00:19:24 -0800
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
    Precedence: bulk

    From: Joe Dees

    > >The only other option is to assume that there's no such thing as memory,
    that > >no one actually recalls the past.
    > >
    > Again, the past is not recalled, but memories of it may be.

    One of the more inane statements I've run across.

    > I ate stew 30 minutes ago, and can recall the experience of doing so quite

    Exactly. You recall the experience itself, not the memory of the
    experience. Let's try to keep a grip on the basics here.


    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 18 2002 - 08:33:23 GMT