Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id DAA03047 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Mon, 18 Feb 2002 03:10:16 GMT Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 22:05:01 -0500 Subject: memetic species Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: "Wade T.Smith" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <200202180226.g1I2QIQ15726@mail9.bigmailbox.com> Message-Id: <4C8387FB-241C-11D6-8DEC-003065B9A95A@harvard.edu> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.480) Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
On Sunday, February 17, 2002, at 09:26 , Joe Dees wrote:
> Actually, different species of birds build differently constructed
> nests, and different species of spiders construct differently
> configured webs, and different species of termites build differently
> configured mounds, but the same species of each construct very similar
> nests and webs and mounds.
Absolutely no argument. These things are indicative of speciation and
environment altering behavior.
> People, OTOH, although all members of a single species, construct
> vastly differing homes in different locations with differing histories,
> even where they have common materials.
But, culture itself could be memetic speciation, yes? (We all do build
shelters and have....) Similarities are just as numerous as differences.
Many geographically diverse peoples made round dwellings, for instance.
Many use wood. There were cave and troglodyte societies in several
areas. I don't see your argument as valid against any skepticism about
culture being a sociobiologic phemonemon- it is merely a statement of
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 18 2002 - 04:07:18 GMT