RE: comparison/contrast of memes and engrams

John C. 'Buck' Field (info@fieldoperative.com)
Mon, 18 Oct 1999 13:13:26 -0500

From: "John C. 'Buck' Field" <info@fieldoperative.com>
To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Subject: RE: comparison/contrast of memes and engrams
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 13:13:26 -0500
In-Reply-To: <B0006594226@hamextw01.htcomp.net>

You had said:

>In terms of the Wilson review of Meme Machine, I'm avoiding the problem of
>saying the openning bars of Beethoven's 5th symphony are a powerful meme
>because they are common. I've defined fitness of the L-meme in terms of
>organism success.

You thus indicated that organism success was a primary metric by which memes could be
judged, which I don't see as having much relation to memetic spread, I failed to
grasp/recognize the inherent problems of "common memes are powerful memes", and I
don't have a method to measure organism success. ....so I feel a piece missing from
your post which seems interesting, but I have not gotten the focus, or something. How
does one judge organism success in a manner that predicts memetic fitness?

Commonality refers to the percentage of a group with a particular characteristic, like
self-identifying as having faith in God, as Republican, or as a netizen, or external
diagnosis of a characteristic like having cholera or allergies.

In epidemiology,

Cultivate A Healthy Mind With Reason, Empathy, And Clear Vision.
Project Management and Technical Writing - www.fieldoperative.com

>-----Original Message-----
>From: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk [mailto:fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk]On Behalf
>Of Mark M. Mills
>Sent: Monday, October 18, 1999 1:59 AM
>To: Memetics List
>Subject: RE: comparison/contrast of memes and engrams
>
>
>John C. 'Buck' Field, info@fieldoperative.com wrote:
>
>>"Commonality" seems easily measured and defined when compared to the
>>introduction of "organism success". What procedure would measure
>>such a metric?
>
>Could you restate your question? It would help if I knew more about how
>you use the term 'commonality.'
>
>Mark
>
>===============================================================
>This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
>Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
>For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
>see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
>

===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit