From: "Tim Rhodes" <proftim@speakeasy.org>
To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: internal meme?
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 13:22:13 -0700
That should read "...all "internal memes" are NOT equal..."
-Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Rhodes <proftim@speakeasy.org>
To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Date: Tuesday, October 05, 1999 11:40 AM
Subject: Re: internal meme?
>Derek wrote:
>
><<<My purpose was to demonstrate that internal memeticists have put very
>little thought into the definition of the very thing they advocate, ie. the
>internal meme.>>>
>
>As someone that falls clearly in the third group on all these things, I
>think it's important to note that all "internal memes" are equal even
within
>that camp. Mark seems to see them as more specific neural configurations,
>where Aaron & Richard (I believe) deal with them much more abstractly as
>elements that make up the "mind".
>
>-Tim
>
>
>
>===============================================================
>This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
>Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
>For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
>see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
>
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit