Re: implied or inferred memes

ïÿÝÔïÿÝ ïÿÞt (edryce@juno.com)
Sun, 19 Sep 1999 18:08:04 -0700

From: <edryce@juno.com>
To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 18:08:04 -0700
Subject: Re: implied or inferred memes

Wade,

I really wanted to know--I was not challenging you. Thank you for
answering my question.

I would like to get an example of your kind of test in the case of NLP.
I am not an advocate of NLP! I am just interested in words and the
different meanings we give to them. I have noticed on this listserv that
frequently it is only meanings of words that cause conflict.

Edryce

On Sun, 19 Sep 1999 18:33:22 -0400 "Wade T.Smith"
<wade_smith@harvard.edu> writes:
>>A question for Wade: What would you accept as "proof"?
>
>A double-blind clinical test with repeatability by more than one lab
>of a
>mechanism. What do _you_ accept as "proof"?
>
>- Wade

===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit