RE: Dawkins' Mutation Test for Replicators

Gatherer, D. (D.Gatherer@organon.nhe.akzonobel.nl)
Mon, 30 Aug 1999 12:21:19 +0200

Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 12:21:19 +0200
From: "Gatherer, D. (Derek)" <D.Gatherer@organon.nhe.akzonobel.nl>
Subject: RE: Dawkins' Mutation Test for Replicators
To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>

Robin:
Thanks for taking the trouble, Derek. But there remains an interesting
technical issue here: if the monkeys learned the behaviour from the
keeper, then they are in some sense capable of imitation.

Derek:
No, they're not imitating the keeper. It's a Skinnerian reinforcement
process.

Robin:
OK, so what
they're imitating is not a conspecific, and some persistence on the
keeper's part was probably required, but how exactly do we distinguish
that scenario from meme transmission? Or do we?

Derek:
Some don't eg. most of the early memeticists like Cavalli-Sforza admit that
they don't really care how behaviours/cultural traits are replicated. But
Sue has her reasons, as listed in her book and JoM article.

===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit