Re: i-memes and m-memes

Robin Faichney (robin@faichney.demon.co.uk)
Mon, 30 Aug 1999 10:14:07 +0100

Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 10:14:07 +0100
To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
From: Robin Faichney <robin@faichney.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: i-memes and m-memes
In-Reply-To: <001401bef26c$b49f96a0$fdb606d1@sbosmr.ma.cable.rcn.com>

In message <001401bef26c$b49f96a0$fdb606d1@sbosmr.ma.cable.rcn.com>,
Aaron Agassi <agassi@erols.com> writes
>Allow me to clarify:
>A microscopic dust particle in a dark cave never seen by any living thing is
>a meme, but one with major replicative disadvantages.

I don't think there's any point in calling it a meme, even a total
failing one, when it has never entered a brain. Meme failures are those
that fail to make it from one brain to another. To say that every thing
is a meme is to make the word meaningless.

-- 
Robin Faichney
Get Your FREE Information at
http://www.conscious-machine.com

=============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit