From: "Chris Lofting" <ddiamond@ozemail.com.au>
To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: information transmission
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 22:27:17 +1100
Hi Mark..
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Mills <mmills@fastlane.net>
To: Memetics List <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Date: Thursday, 25 March 1999 5:08
Subject: Re: information transmission
>Chris,
>
>>>How do you think the 'personal holographic film' evolved?
>>>
>>
>>sex.
>>
>>Fundamentalist processes are archetypal and so asexual or androgynous.
>
>Let me rephrase the question. What selective advantage allowed the
>'personal holographic film' to evolve? Associated with this question is,
>'what source did the personal holographic film evolve from'?
>
seeing variations on a theme rather than the 'one' theme. Archetypal
processing is very single context. IT is based on oppositions, light vs
dark. these are enternal and so the 'same' theme, the same cast in every
battle and the war is eternal.
Now see the male and female as cooperative and so variations on a theme.
more 'human'. advantageous wouldnt you say?
best,
Chris.
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~ddiamond
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit