From: "Tim Rhodes" <proftim@speakeasy.org>
To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Papers critical of memetics
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 1999 21:20:47 -0800
Bruce Howlett wrote:
>Aaron, Richard and Tim, (in alpha order)
>
>Thanks guys for yet another round of entertaining memetic debate.
You're welcome! There's no reason memetics can't be both informative and
entertaining at the same time.
>Seriously, if it wasn't for your ongoing scraps, this would be a very
>boring list. Have you considered viewing this phenomena from a systems
>perspective?
Yes. (Believe me, my actual opinions are seldom as extreme as I might
portray them in public.)
-Tim R.
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit