Re: On Gatherer's behaviourist stance - previously Xtra!: Brodie defends Lynch

Robert G. Grimes (grimes@fcol.com)
Sat, 05 Sep 1998 12:58:43 -0400

Date: Sat, 05 Sep 1998 12:58:43 -0400
From: "Robert G. Grimes" <grimes@fcol.com>
To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Subject: Re: On Gatherer's behaviourist stance - previously Xtra!: Brodie defends Lynch

Paul Marsden wrote:

> A Brief Reply to Derek Gatherer's Behaviourist Stance.
>

Snipped the most excellent comments and good suggestions.....

This sounds pretty good as I understand it and Paul presented it in a fashion
that agreed with how I "thought I thought" about the situation.

Now we will see if others understand it as I think I do...

Cordially,

Bob
(Still a behaviorist....)

--
Bob Grimes

http://members.aol.com/bob5266/ http://www.hotwired.com/members/profile/bobinjax/ http://www.phonefree.com/Scripts/cgiParse.exe?sID=28788 Jacksonville, Florida Bob5266@aol.com robert.grimes@mailexcite.com Bobgrimes@zdnetmail.com

Man is not in control, but the man who knows he is not in control is more in control...

Quoth the Raven, "Nevermore....."

=============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit