re. Social science as very limited

Paul Marsden (PaulMarsden@email.msn.com)
Tue, 1 Sep 1998 19:19:59 +0100

From: "Paul Marsden" <PaulMarsden@email.msn.com>
To: "memetics" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Subject: re. Social science as very limited
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1998 19:19:59 +0100

Bob Grimes wrote

>I believe I understand your reaction and the desire to be scientific but
>hesitate to remind you that the psycho/social/anthropological world is very
>limited in its "scientific armament" except where dealing with historical
>artifacts, dating, and more recently with linguistics and PET scan
>technology, etc.

Please explain this to me and the rest of my faculty of social SCIENCE -
Perhaps we and our tools are very limited, do please elaborate. Owning a
PET scanner doesn't make you a scientist nor does arcane symbolic language
which is not grounded in empirical events.

Paul Marsden
Graduate Research Centre in the Social Sciences
University of Sussex
e-mail PaulMarsden@msn.com
tel/fax (44) (0) 117 974 1279

Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission:
http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit/

===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit